Ramblings of a 1/3-aged housewife
Monday, July 12, 2010
Long time between drinks or 'long time, no effort'
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
We need ch-ch-ch-changes...
Ah Tony Abbott, God Bless you (because I won’t be). Your timing is not so much impeccable as it is despicable. This is the week of that long awaited for Copenhagen Conference to address climate change. The week where those of us who want to see our planet protected, are hoping against hope that governments of the world embrace the idea of changing our current ways and take big, brave steps.
And in this very week where boldness, innovation, and thinking-outside-squares is of vital importance, Tony Abbott drags back from the brink of extinction old, conservative, stultifying MPs to his front bench. Bishop, Andrews, Ruddock - *creak creak, groan groan*. Anyone wanting a vibrant and forward looking opposition to move our country forward can only gape in amazement, disbelief and dread. It feels a little like we are scuba diving and on our ascent, with our oxygen running out, needing to break the sea’s surface to take big deep breaths. And instead being caught and held around the ankles by thick, toxic, seaweed. We need lungfuls of revitalising, fresh air and instead we are given salty water.
Is this indicative of a general fear of change around the country? Why do we fear change when such change is exactly what we need and perhaps, what will save us as a species? Why, for example, do we fail to focus on the opportunities that climate change can ring in and focus only on what we’ll lose? Do we not have enough faith in our own intellectual stock that we don’t think we’ll be able to find new resources (albeit intellectual ones) to export. We have the brains to do it – and so far, other countries are reaping the benefits. Aussies seem to only to be able to trust and rely on those assets we have which are tangible, and for which we are in fact, just lucky to possess, i.e. coal, LNG. Living in a regional town whose prosperity is reliant almost solely on coal and other mining, I understand the costs that could result if such mining was restricted or ceased in order to reduce carbon emissions. However, is it too simplistic to think that our prosperity and high standard of living are pointless if we have no liveable climate to survive in?
Those of us alive today and in the generations to come are lumbered with the slowly failing earth that we have been given by our forebears. It is just our bad luck, really, that the ‘buck stops with us’. Handing this problem on to generations and generations to come is cowardly and unethical. We as a nation and a global community need a little tough love. We need to stop sulking, cease denying that we have to be the ones to make the difficult decisions and find new ways of living.
I’m not saying it will be easy. When we compare a general fear of change with an inability to change ourselves or our own immediate environment we can perhaps understand the reluctance. So often we personally know what part of our own lives or families or homes need changing or improving, yet taking the impetus to change it eludes us. It could be losing weight, teaching a non-sleeping child to sleep better and hence putting up with the week(s) of unsettledness and sleep deprivation that will entail (as in my case). We maintain the status quo, no matter how unhealthy or dysfunctional it is because we are unsure of the outcome of change or don't have the ability to think clearly enough to know how to create that change. But what opportunities are lost? Instead of seeing the exciting, healthier possibilities which grow at the top of our ruts, we dig in deeper and deeper. Denial is easy and seductive, but slowly, almost invisibly, destructive.
We need to be excited about changing; personally, locally and globally. We need to be shown the infinite possibilities, not the finite losses. Yes, responsibility can be a frightening weight to bear but it means also that we can be the creators of brave, bold and beautiful new worlds. Let’s move forward and leave the stick-in-the-muds behind. Up to their necks in it.
Friday, November 27, 2009
Wii wii wii all the way home
We now have a Wii. Or should I say more correctly that the Wii has us. By the proverbial short and curlies. Now I have been anti computer games for most of my life. As far as I was concerned my children would have to be in their late teens before I acquiesced to purchase them a mind-numbing, muscle dysmorphing computer game. But alas, in the constant compromising and selling out that is parenthood (at least in my case) we got a Wii. Really I just wanted the Wii Fit, in a delusional thought that I would be able to get fit 'in the comfort of my own home' rather than try to go walking with a 2 & 4 year old in tow. Of course, the reality is so vastly different from the dream. I have exercised twice in the month we’ve had it, yet the Wii has kindly advised that we (primarily the 4 year old) has now played Super Mario Bros Kart 600 times. I’m not sure whether they are congratulating us for that or admonishing me for allowing my son to play their game so many times. It could very well be the latter. The Wii Fit is astonishingly passive aggressive. Really , it is.
The second time I managed to wangle myself an hour on the Wii Fit one of the first messages was ‘Hooli (my Mii), have you been busy?’ Translation: it’s been a week you slack bitch, where have you been? And any time that you end an exercise session early you get a ‘hooli, is there something wrong’ – so not only are you remonstrated for not finishing what you’ve started, you now feel bad for hurting the Wii’s feelings! Like they have any! Seriously,you might as well get a Catholic priest or a Rabbi to be your personal trainer if you want to be motivated by that level of guilt. And the rating system is also fantastic for your self-esteem (just as catholicism is, not!). Apparently my ability to hoola hoop, follow a step routine, and knock out a punching bag is rated at a level called 'simmering fire'. This would be fine as a porn name or lap dancer name (now there's a new Wii Fit game potential, along with pole dancing ... hmmmm) - but as a level of skill it leaves a little to be desired. I wonder what the top level is? 'Catastrophic Fireball'?
Wii’s are a very good way of determining if your child(ren) have addictive personalities. There are many signs. If you are awoken pre-dawn by a little voice in your ear saying ‘please Mummy, can I play Mario’ then you have an addict on your hands (as well as an insomniac). If a voice comes from the backseat when you are driving and tells you to mount the kerb and hit the wheelie bin because it will earn you 10 points, then you have an addict. If they count down 3,2,1 Go at traffic lights you have an addict. You might as well enrol them in rehab now.
But I confess that the addiction doesn’t stop with the kids. One reason (that I’m sticking to) for not using the Wii Fit more often is that the room in which we have it doesn’t have enough space. I am constantly having to move the balance board to accommodate the activity. If the exercise requires hands in the air I have to manoeuvre the board away from the low lying ceiling fan (admittedly I am partial to my fingers remaining attached to my hands). If the exercise requires lying down, I have to move it away from the walls. The sign of addiction? Not only completely rearranging the furniture in the room to accommodate the Wii but rearranging rooms throughout your house. And then considering that maybe you’ll have to move house. It won’t be long till new display homes have ‘Wii Rooms’ as well as the now ubiquitous ‘Theatre Rooms’. Believe me, if you can have display homes with handbasins inbuilt into hallway walls, then ‘Wii Rooms’ aren’t that far fetched. Ridiculous yes, but far-fetched? Probably not.